Statement by
H. E. Dr. Javad Zarif
Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran
before the Security Council
New York, 11
March 2003
…………………………………
In the name
of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful
Mr. President,
May I first congratulate you on your assumption of the
presidency of the Security Council for the month of March.
Allow me also to express my appreciation to Ambassador Gunter Pleager of Germany
for the dynamic and productive way he conducted the work of the Council in February.
I am also grateful for the timely convening of this important meeting. Here, I shouldn’t fail to thank the UN
weapons inspectors, skillfully led by Dr. Hans Blix
and Dr. Mohammad ELBaradei, for their professionalism
and the comprehensive reports they have thus far presented to the Security
Council.
Mr. President,
The unanimous adoption of Security Council resolution
1441 and the deployment of international weapons inspectors in Iraq
have demonstrated the ability of the international community, represented by
this Council, to act together in the interest of attaining a common goal. The
big question mark, now, hanging over us is as to why the course the Security
Council wisely embarked upon should be prematurely aborted. At a time when the
chief inspectors have recommend that they be given relatively
short time to complete the work mandated by this Council, the persistent question
is why there should be a rush to war.
It is true that the disarmament of Iraq should not have dragged on for
12 years. It is also true that the Iraqi Government should have fulfilled its
obligations much earlier and the fragmentary and grudging cooperation on the
part of Iraq
is a main cause of the current crisis. As the victims of one of the wars of
aggression, the major victim of harboring of terrorism and the only victim of
these weapons of mass destruction, we certainly understand the frustration of
the international community. But as a
country that in the span of two decades has had to suffer directly from one war
and face the enormous consequences of another, we know that yet another war in
our region is not something that one could easily and hurriedly make recourse
to. Two wrongs will not make it right. When it comes to a devastating war, in
which thousands upon thousands of Iraqi innocent civilians would undoubtedly
perish, it would be morally and politically unacceptable if considerations such
as hot weather, moonless nights, troop fatigue and the like were to take
precedence.
Mr. President,
I don’t think that I need to recall how high the stakes
are. We all have an idea of the unparalleled disaster that a possible war could
bring about. The humanitarian crisis in Iraq and in the neighboring
countries might take catastrophic dimensions. The threat of disintegration of Iraq
and instability in the region is significant. The fact that extremism stands to
benefit the most from a war is undeniable. There are worrying signs that the
right of the Iraqi people to self-determination may be among the casualties of
a possible war. Neither the Iraqi people nor the international community can
accept any encroachment on the sovereignty and independence of a UN Member State,
no matter how short some may claim it to be at the outset.
Moreover, the stakes have already gone far beyond Iraq. The
rush to war has already placed the current functioning international system on
the line. It is quite irresponsible to rejoice over the fantasy of “the post UN
world” as a hawkish columnist did yesterday. We fully support the warning issued
by the Secretary-General yesterday and again today in his thoughtful article in
the Wall Street Journal. My Government is equally gravely concerned over the
outright attempts underway to undermine the United Nations system and the
achievements that humankind has incrementally accomplished over a very long
period of time in institutionalizing the rule of law at the international
level.
Mr. President,
Against the backdrop of any realistic scenario, all of which
would amount to no less than a real nightmare, any chance, even as slim as it
may look, should be seized. War is such a dangerously imperceptive solution,
particularly when innovative proposals and ideas for strengthening of the
inspections, setting of clear targets to remove the regional and international
anxieties about Iraqi behavior and guaranteeing the right of Iraqi people to
self-determination, while maintaining Iraq’s sovereignty and territorial
integrity are already on the table.
In this
context, it is first and foremost incumbent upon the Iraqi Government to take
irreversible steps to reassure its neighbors and the international community
that it genuinely wishes to live in peace and fully implement all its
obligations under various Security Council resolutions, starting with continuing
and expanding active cooperation with the weapons inspectors.
Mr. President,
While Members of the international community, including
my Government, are unanimous on the need for fully implementing the relevant resolutions
of the Security Council, the rush to war is clearly undermining the momentum
built for bringing this issue to a successful end. The division and tension it
creates is alienating the world public opinion and the great majority of
governments, thus creating serious doubts about the agenda behind it. The
different and some times conflicting reasons invoked to justify a premature
recourse to military action can’t but strengthen the doubts. And this is a new
layer of doubts that adds up to previous layers resulting from selectivity in
enforcing UN resolutions and treaties on nonproliferation. Allowing the Security Council to have the
final word in bringing the current crisis to a successful conclusion would
certainly be a significant step in the right direction.